Browsing Posts published in January, 2011

I am slowly building my dashboard of economic indicators that I most regularly follow.  For each, I will try to give you a brief description, the latest reading and what I understand to be its implications.  For simplicity, I will assign each a rating of positive, neutral or negative.  Generally, a “positive” rating is consistent with economic growth that is close to or better than average, enough to sustain good job growth.  Neutral would imply slow or no economic growth but not a recession or worse.  Negative would be indicative of a slowdown or recession.

ADS Business Conditions Index (link here)

From the actual description:

The Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti business conditions index is designed to track real business conditions at high frequency. Its underlying (seasonally adjusted) economic indicators (weekly initial jobless claims; monthly payroll employment, industrial production, personal income less transfer payments, manufacturing and trade sales; and quarterly real GDP) blend high- and low-frequency information and stock and flow data.  The average value of the ADS index is zero. Progressively bigger positive values indicate progressively better-than-average conditions, whereas progressively more negative values indicate progressively worse-than-average conditions. The ADS index may be used to compare business conditions at different times.

This index combines information from several indicators (noted above).  If the value is zero, then conditions are average.  Higher is better.  The tricky part is reading the graph.  There are two vertical lines.  Everything to the left of the vertical line represents values that incorporate all of the underlying indicators mentioned.  In between the two vertical marks, the index only incorporates data from weekly jobless claims and at least two monthly indicators.  To the right of the last vertical line, it represents only weekly jobless claims and maybe one monthly indicator.  The bottom line here is that our confidence in the value of the index decreases as we move to the right past those vertical lines.

Latest Reading: -0.06 on Jan 1, 2011.  But this value is not one we can be too confident in given that it is based on only jobless claims and maybe one other indicator.  The somewhat more confidence-inspiring data between the two vertical bars shows a clear upward trend, implying improving business conditions.  As more data comes in, we can be more confident.  Overall, this index points to improving conditions but slightly below average conditions at this time.

Economic Indicator Roundup (January 6, 2011) continue reading…

Share

I am slowly building my dashboard of economic indicators that I most regularly follow.  For each, I will try to give you a brief description, the latest reading and what I understand to be its implications.  For simplicity, I will assign each a rating of positive, neutral or negative.  Generally, a “positive” rating is consistent with economic growth that is close to or better than average, enough to sustain good job growth.  Neutral would imply slow or no economic growth but not a recession or worse.  Negative would be indicative of a slowdown or recession.

Daily Consumer Leading Indicators (link here)

From the actual description:

The Consumer Leading Indicators track consumer interest in major discretionary purchases. These typically include such items as automobiles, housing, vacations, durable household goods and investments. Not included would be expenditures that are more or less automatic, relatively minor and/or non-discretionary, such as groceries, fuel or utilities.

Consumer spending accounts for about two-thirds of the overall U.S. economy.  So, what the consumer is doing is often a strong indicator of how things are going.  This indicator measures the consumer’s interest in items that are discretionary, meaning that they are not necessary for survival like food, gas or water.  The data is tracked every day and posted only a day or two later, so this is one of those rare almost real-time indicators.

NOTE:  The way the daily index is reported may be a little confusing.  The overall index is expressed as a percent relative to the same day last year.  So, if the index is at 95% today, it means that consumer interest overall in discretionary items is 95% of what it was last year on this day.  But then, they go on to show the “Growth Index Values” for 3, 6 and 12 months (91, 183 and 365 days).  This just means that they take the average of the daily index for the past 3, 6 or 12 months.  This way, they iron out some of the ups and downs that you would see from day to day.  There are some other ways they express their data, but right now I don’t want to confuse you too much.  Focus on the overall daily index (not the individual categories, like “housing” or “automotive”) and the 91-day growth index value.

Latest Reading: During the last week of 2010 and on the first day of 2011, the index was between 94 and 96.   Thus, consumer interest in discretionary purchases was a step below where it was last year.  If you look at the average value over the last 91 days, it translates to a growth rate of -4.56% (or an index value of 95.44).  If graded on a curve, this would be in the bottom 3 percentile of all 91-day average values available since spring of 1947.  That means, 97% of such intervals since then would result in a better growth rate.  This index has been in a contraction mode for many months now and goes against what many “conventional” economic indicators are saying.  A major reason for this discrepancy is that this index is a pure measure of consumer purchases and does not do some of the adjustments that other indicators do (like subtracting money spent on imports from other countries).

NOTE: I was away for several months after starting this blog with a few posts.  I’m updating the USA Today indicator without a full post about it this time.  In the future, I plan to have a detailed post each time I update an indicator on my dashboard.

Economic Indicator Roundup (January 5, 2011) continue reading…

Share

My vision is to have a dashboard of sorts composed of all the different indicators that I like to follow.  I’d like to update them periodically and share them with you.  I hope to have a brief explanation of why each one may be useful, along with a blurb about what the most recent indicator reading may mean.

Bloomberg Financial Conditions Index (link here)

From the actual description:

The Bloomberg Financial Conditions Index combines yield spreads and indices from the Money Markets, Equity Markets, and Bond Markets into a normalized index. The values of this index are z-scores, which represent the number of standard deviations that current financial conditions lie above or below the average of the 1994-June 2008 period.

OK, so what does all that mean?  First of all, it is a way of assessing what the current financial conditions are.  According to this article, this index “monitors the level of stress in the U.S. financial markets.”  A value of zero represents conditions that are at the level you’d get if you average them from 1994 until June 2008.  Essentially, this represents the “normal” level of stress, and any deviation from the norm is captured in this index.  The amount above or below zero is expressed in standard deviations, which is a fancy statistical way of saying “graded on a curve.”

When this index is high (good), it means that money is probably flowing well between banks and businesses or consumers.  When it goes lower (worse), it means that credit is probably tough to get, so many businesses and people cannot get a hold of the money they need to take care of their needs (hiring workers, buying inventory, buying machinery, buying homes/cars, etc.)

Latest Reading: +0.32  The index has been above zero most of the time since September 2010.  For several months after the “Flash Crash” (when the stock market took an incredible nosedive for part of the day on May 5), this index was down near the -1 to -1.5 level.  But that danger was averted as the levels returned back to normal levels and now a bit better.  This is great news for the economy, which needs to have stable financial conditions for businesses to hire workers and for the housing market to recover eventually.

Economic Indicator Roundup (January 4, 2011) continue reading…

Share