Browsing Posts published in July, 2011

This is my standard intro to technical analysis – you can skip to the chart if you read this feature regularly:

Many people who trade in the markets believe that there are patterns that can generally lead to profitable trades.  By analyzing stock charts that show the change in price along with the volume (how many shares were traded), “technical analysts” believe they have an edge and can time their trades profitably.  There is significant controversy over this subject, however.  Others say that, unless you have some information that no one else does, basically you can never beat “the market” because everything is already baked into the current price of a stock.

Nevertheless, supporters of “technical analysis” are everywhere, and the tools for their trade can be found throughout bookstores and the Internet.  I like to follow some websites that do some of the work automatically and provide a snapshot opinion of whether a particular stock is considered “bullish” (going to go up in price), “bearish” (going to go down in price) or “neutral” (stay about the same price).

For simplicity, I’d like to start by showing you a snapshot of what several technical analysis websites suggest about the exchange traded fund (ETF) with the ticker symbol of SPY.  This fund is supposed to go up and down the same as the S&P 500 index does.  And many people consider the S&P 500 index (a measure of the price of the 500 largest US companies) to be an accurate gauge of where “the market” stands.  I will also add an indicator that is about the market in general (CBOE Put Call Ratio).

For each of the sources below, where I have a choice, I will use a measure that attempts to predict the future direction of SPY or S&P 500 in the next 3 months. continue reading…

Share
Share
Share
  • New monthly feature starting soon – is the S&P 500 index lower or higher than it should be?
    In a few days, I’ll post my first review of whether the S&P 500 index is considered to be “cheap” (lower than it should be), “expensive” (higher than it should be) or “fairly valued” (right about where it should be).  You can read the details about the methods used for this at . Bottom line [...]
  • Easynomics Twitter Updates for Today
    Despite #debt “crisis” #financial conditions down only a nudge since end of last week. http://bloom.bg/nZt58I #economy #budget # #Consumer confidence surprisingly higher in July! Key area of #economy that needs to get better for full #recovery http://bit.ly/nqLq4v # #Consumer #leadingindicators leveling off after big rise last two weeks. Bodes very well for 3Q #GDP http://bit.ly/pbgXy5 [...]
Share

In a few days, I’ll post my first review of whether the S&P 500 index is considered to be “cheap” (lower than it should be), “expensive” (higher than it should be) or “fairly valued” (right about where it should be).  You can read the details about the methods used for this at Easy Intro to Market Valuation.

Bottom line is that things get “out of whack” all the time in the stock market and other areas of the economy.  For evidence, just think back to the Internet “bubble” of the late ’90s or the real estate bubble of the mid 2000′s.  In both of these cases, the prices people were paying for stocks or houses were much, much higher than the “true value” of owning them.  And once people woke up from their euphoric state of thinking they were rich beyond belief, continue reading…

Share
Share