Initial Weekly Unemployment Claims (4-Week Moving Average) thru Week Ending March 16, 2013 – Easy Trends
In this article, I’ll do an “Easy Trends” analysis of the initial weekly unemployment claims data. “Easy Trends” is a place where I’ll analyze the recent trend for an indicator and discuss whether it is currently going up, down or neither. You can read the basics of my methodology on the FAQ page.
NOTE: You may be reading an outdated analysis. Please visit my latest unemployment claims trend analysis for more info.
Quick ‘n Easy
By tracking the number of people who are filing for unemployment benefits for the first time each week, we get a quick insight into the latest status of the economy’s health. Fewer claims equals more jobs, which equals more income, which usually equals more consumer spending (70% of the economy!) that supports company profits, which in turn can lead to more hiring.
First, a nice summary about Initial Weekly Unemployment Claims and why they matter, from Econoday: (note: “jobless claims” are the same as unemployment claims)
Jobless claims are an easy way to gauge the strength of the job market. The fewer people filing for unemployment benefits, the more have jobs, and that tells investors a great deal about the economy. Nearly every job comes with an income that gives a household spending power. Spending greases the wheels of the economy and keeps it growing, so a stronger job market generates a healthier economy.
Here’s a chart showing the last ten years of the four-week moving average for weekly jobless claims from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: (may be one week old due to publishing lag from St. Louis Fed, usually if it’s still early Thursday morning)
Unemployment Claims Trends and Projections
Below, I will discuss whether unemployment claims data is currently in a trend, when the last confirmed trend was and what that says about projecting the next data point to be released.
Unemployment Claims Trend Analysis
Quick ‘n Easy
The 4-week moving average (a more reliable measure that smooths things out) decreased (by 7,500) with the latest report, so we still have a confirmed downward (good) trend of about 5,250 claims per week. My calculations suggest it’s possible but all that likely next week’s figure will be low enough to include in the falling trend. Not to worry though, because it’s not so bad if we don’t move much lower considering we’re at a nice and healthy level now.
Current Trend: (Week ending) Feb 16 – Mar 16, 2013. During that time, there was a confirmed downward (good) trend in which the four-week average of initial weekly unemployment claims was falling by about 5,250 per week.
Last Confirmed Trend: (Week ending) Jan 5 – Jan 19, 2013. During that time, initial weekly unemployment claims were falling (good) by about 7,500 per week.
Projected Next Data Point
The next report is for the week ending March 23, 2013. If the most recent trend (excluding off trend points) were extended perfectly, the actual week ending March 23 reading would be about 328,000 so that the 4-wk moving average would be at the expected level of about 335,000. That’s about 8,000 fewer claims than the latest reading, so it’s possible but probably difficult to achieve given how low the current levels already are. More importantly, what would it need to be just to continue the confirmed falling trend? Read on.
The way a 4-week moving average works, you throw out the oldest of the four single week readings and add the next one. In other words, we will throw out the 347,000 single week reading for the week ending February 23 and add next week’s number. If next week’s number is higher (lower) than that, the 4-week moving average will move higher (lower) – simple as that. Based on my calculations, a weekly reading of about 338,000 or lower would continue the downward trend. That means even a rise of 2,000 in claims would be low enough to include in the downward trend. Therefore, next week’s report has a decent chance of being included in the falling trend, and because we are at a favorable level now, as long we’re not reversing the trend and moving up, it’s fine if things flatten out.
With the latest report on weekly jobless claims, we still have a confirmed downward (good) trend again, and as I predicted last week, the latest reading was good enough to negate last week’s reading that was off trend too high. My calculations show that it’s possible next week’s reading will be low enough to include in this falling trend, but don’t be surprised if it’s too high – especially because data is usually revised higher the following week anyway. Considering we’re at a level below 350,000 right now, it’s fine if we don’t move much lower. Typically, for the four-week moving average, anything under 400,000 is probably indicative of a growing labor force. We’re below that level and should stay there for a while, keeping any talk of current recession at bay.
The latest single week’s reading of jobless claims was 2,000 higher than last week’s revised reading – coming in at 336,000 this time. The latest single reading was lower than the one that it replaced in the 4-week moving average, causing a drop in the 4-week moving average by 7,500. The four-week moving average (339,750) is now the lowest it’s been since February 2008! We currently have a confirmed falling (good) trend of about 5,250 claims per week.
Weekly initial unemployment claims is one of the most important jobs indicators because, of all the jobs-related indicators, it is the closest to being a leading indicator of any kind. Typically, we see changes in the labor market lagging the changes that we see in the general economy, but initial weekly unemployment claims are about synchronous with the general economy. Some argue they are slightly leading. Even if you are worried that things might slow down in the coming weeks or months, as long as the 4-week moving average of the unemployment claims stays down below 400,000 we probably aren’t in a recession.