Browsing Posts in Easy Pod

Housing and Real Estate – Easy Pod (May 17, 2012)

Housing and real estate were at the center of the most recent financial crisis, so it should be obvious why it is an important part of our economy …

For a “Quick ‘n Easy” read, just review the labeled white boxes, then skip to my “Easy Take” summary at the end.  You can review any charts/graphs afterward.  I want to make sure no one is intimidated by the length of my posts, even though I’m trying to making them easy …

I’m continuing with a feature called “Easy Pod” – a collection of indicators that help portray the current status of something.  In this post, that something is housing and real estate. Let’s first review a few key concepts that are important to know about housing and real estate: (you can skip to below the first horizontal line if you’ve read this Easy Pod in the past)

  • There are two basic kinds of real estate, residential and non-residential.  Residential refers to places where people live.  Non-residential includes things like businesses, office buildings or warehouses.
  • For residential real estate (this is what we’ll refer to as “housing”) there are new homes and existing homes.  The difference should be fairly obvious.  New homes are looking for their first owner, while existing homes already have an owner.
  • “Inventory” is how many of something you have available to sell.  When we talk about the current inventory of new homes, we are talking about how many new homes are available to be sold.  When inventory is high, that makes it more likely that prices will be lower.  Remember, it’s the “supply and demand” basics here.  If you have too much of something, people will pay less for it.  The way we try to measure inventory in housing is by comparing how many unsold homes there are versus how fast homes are selling.  That’s why you’ll see things like “8 months inventory.”  It means that, at the current rate of home sales, it would take 8 months to get rid of the extra inventory.
  • Sales levels and prices are definitely related to one another.  If you see home sales slowing down, it means that homes are not in as much demand, so chances are good that prices will go down.  You have to look at the combination of housing prices, sales and inventory to get a good feel for what’s going on.

There are a number of indicators that describe what’s going on in housing and real estate, and there are even some people who combine these indicators into one number (an index) to give a summary.  In this “Easy Pod” I will show you indicators and indices that I like to follow.  Check back regularly for updates.

Special note:  You’ll notice a bunch of my charts shown below come from Calculated Risk.  This is a must-see for information on the economy.  I visit this site multiple times every day.  Bill McBride does a fantastic job of analyzing the most important economic data and events, putting them in context.


Quick Summary

Indicator (Click for details – only works if full article is open) Current Rating (change)
New Home Sales Negative
Housing Starts Negative
NMHC Quarterly Survey of Apartment Market Conditions Neutral   (downgrade)
NAHB Housing Market Index (HMI) Negative
Easynomics Real Estate Price Stability Index Positive




Indicator: New Home Sales   |   NEGATIVE
Easy Intro: None yet   |   Link to SourceClick here   |   Latest Date This Info Represents: March 2012

Quick ‘n Easy

Every new home that is built and sold adds to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), helping our economy grow.  Unfortunately, in April 2012, new homes were selling at an extremely low rate.  Fortunately, not too many new homes are being built so that the ones in inventory (still on the market) can get cleared out at a normal pace.

Housing and Real Estate - New Home Sales March 2012 - Calculated Risk

Courtesy: CalculatedRiskBlog.com

Easy Description: Statistics that tell us how many new single-family homes (basically a building for one family, not apartments or condos) were sold.  It also tells us about the selling price of those homes and the unsold inventory of new homes (waiting to be sold).

Latest Reading: If sales in March 2012 were to continue at that rate for a whole year, there would be 328,000 new homes sold.  This “annualized” rate is 7.1 percent lower than last month’s rate, and it is 7.5 percent above the rate from the same month last year.  The median sales price (half of homes sold for less than this amount, the other half sold for more) was $234,500.  That is 6.3 percent higher than the median price one year ago.  There were 144,000 new homes still for sale (inventory), so at the current pace it would take about 5.3 months to sell the remainder.

Also, take a look at my latest new residential homes inventory months of supply trend analysis to see where the trends are headed.

Implications: The pace of new home sales has largely been moving sideways for some time but is giving us some hope since rising a bit in the 4th quarter of 2011.  The “5.3 months of inventory” part is key to understanding that home builders have done a pretty good job of adjusting to market conditions.  Because so few homes are being sold, they have been dropping the number of homes they build way down, which means that supply is decreasing and price isn’t decreasing as much.  (Quick refresher on “supply and demand” – when something has a bigger supply  than there is a demand for it, sellers are forced to lower the price so that buyers will have a greater willingness to buy it.)  We are at incredibly low levels of new home construction, which is why that inventory months of supply figure is not way above historical averages anymore.  Before the housing boom, the typical months of inventory level was around 6 months.  At the 6 months level, prices tend to be stable.

So, what happens if new homes start selling again?  Builders will start making more homes, which will push up supply just enough to keep up with the new demand so that prices don’t move too much in one direction or the other.  The kind of massive price increases we saw in the housing boom were unsustainable, just as massive price decreases from this point would have to be temporary, too.  Market forces will always push things toward a “healthy” equilibrium.

But regardless of the fact that the inventory number is looking pretty decent, this number of sales (328,000 annualized rate) is just awful.  And when fewer homes are being sold, that’s less economic growth.  The sale of a new home is just like the sale of a car, television or clothes – someone made something and sold it, which adds to the GDP.  What we’d like to see from here is a continued increase in new home sales numbers while keeping that months of inventory right around the 6 month mark.  That would mean the housing market is on its way to greater positive contributions to the GDP report without having any false imbalances in the system.

Easynomics Rating Methodology: The long term average is about 672,000 new homes sold per year.  I’d like to see numbers that are within 15 percent of that average.  Therefore, I will give this indicator a rating based on the average of the last three months’ annual selling pace: Above 772,000 is “positive”; below 571,000 is “negative”; anything between is “neutral.”

continue reading…

Share

Consumer Index – Easy Pod (Apr 19, 2012)

We live in a world where the consumer is king (or queen), so we have to understand how he or she is doing by looking at a consumer index or two.  Below, we’ll tackle the issue in a more systematic way.  Let’s get started.

This first section is the same intro I have each time for this Easy Pod, so skip ahead to the indicators if you’ve already read it.

I’m continuing with a feature I’m calling “Easy Pod” – a collection of indicators that help portray the current status of something.  In this post, that something is a consumer index summary.  Let’s first review quickly what a consumer is and why we might care to follow a consumer index.

Quick ‘n Easy

Consumer spending makes up about 70% of our economy, so we care deeply about how they are doing.  Although intuitively it makes sense that a more confident consumer would spend more, it turns out that income is a bigger factor.  Still, consumer index data like the consumer’s confidence and sentiment are good coincident indicators of how the economy is doing.

From Merriam-Webster Dictionary:

Consumer = one that utilizes economic goods

We talk a lot about the GDP (Gross Domestic Product – Easy Intro to GDP) as the accepted measure of overall economic activity.  Well, guess what makes up about two-thirds of that economic activity?  That’s right, laundry detergent purchases.  Just kidding.  It’s consumer spending.  That’s me, you, your neighbor … every one of us is a consumer, and the more we spend, the better the economy is generally doing.

Naturally, there is a huge interest in knowing how consumers are feeling.  Are they confident about their financial health, which would mean they are more likely to make big purchases like cars, appliances, vacation packages, etc.?  Or are they extremely concerned about losing their jobs or having their homes decrease in value, which might make them put off those purchases and even spend less at the grocery store?

To assess these kinds of things, there are countless indicators of the health of the consumer.  In this “Easy Pod” I will take a look at the consumer index landscape.  Check back regularly for updates.

Consumer Index – Quick Summary

Consumer Index (Click for details – only works if full article is open) Current Rating (change)
Daily Consumer Leading Indicators Negative   (downgrade)
Bloomberg US Weekly Consumer Comfort Index Neutral   (upgrade)
Consumer Confidence Index (The Conference Board) Negative
Consumer Sentiment (University of Michigan) Negative

continue reading…

Share

Job Growth – Jobs, Employment, Labor and Livelihood Overview (JELLO) – Easy Pod (Apr 11, 2012)

Job growth is key to a thriving, healthy economy.  I’m continuing a feature called “Easy Pod” – a collection of indicators that help portray the current status of something.  In this post, that something is the employment situation of the country, which of course will examine job growth as a major factor.

Quick ‘n Easy

Why do we care about job growth?  Without jobs, consumers can’t be consumers because they wouldn’t have any money to spend.  In a healthy economy, we see strong job growth and a low unemployment rate.

Why do we care so much about jobs, employment, labor and livelihood so much? (OK – so that last term is something I threw in there to make “JELLO” work – investors don’t use that one!)  Simply put, jobs are the lifeline of the economy.  When the economy is working at its best, we have great ideas that turn into great products.  And those great products have to be manufactured, marketed and sold to the consumer.  In order to make all of that happen, there have to people working to make it happen.  That means job growth.  And the income they take home will enable them to buy a house, a car, groceries, clothes, toys, appliances, vacations and tickets to the movies.  All of the money they spent is now income for another set of people, who then go and do the same thing.  Without a job, consumers don’t have (or don’t act like they have) the money to buy anything, so the whole thing slows down.  That’s good enough for an “Easy” look at why we want to see job growth and why jobs matter.

There are a number of indicators that shed light on what’s happening in employment, and there are even some people who combine these indicators into one number (an index) to give a summary.  In this “Easy Pod” I will take a look at a few indicators and indices that I like to follow to decipher what’s happening in job growth.  Check back regularly for updates.


Quick Summary

Indicator (Click for details – only works if full article is open) Current Rating (Change)
Monthly Change in Nonfarm Payrolls Positive
Employment Trends Index Neutral   (downgrade)
ISM Report on Business Positive
Gallup Daily Poll: U.S. Employment Negative
Easynomics Temporary Staffing Index  (NEW INDEX) Neutral
Intuit Small Business Employment Index Positive




Indicator: Nonfarm Payrolls – Monthly Change   |   POSITIVE
Easy Intro: None yet   |   Link to Nonfarm Payrolls data   |   Latest Date This Info Represents: March 2012

Quick ‘n Easy

The monthly change in jobs (excluding farming jobs, because they have lots of ups and downs that mask the underlying trend) is one of the most widely accepted barometers of the labor market.  The average monthly change over the past three months has been greater than the typical number of people entering the workforce, which is great news.

Job Growth - Nonfarm Payroll Employment SA - March 2012 - FRED

Source: StLouisFed.org

Easy Description: Every month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) issues the “Employment Situation Summary” and discusses the changes in the labor market.  The headline number everyone looks for is the change in nonfarm payrolls.  The reason we are looking for the change in number of “nonfarm” jobs is that farming is a very seasonal business, so its patterns mask the general underlying trends in the regular labor market.

Generally speaking, we need about 100,000 new jobs per month to keep up with the number of people who are entering the labor force nationwide.  Because we’ve lost millions of jobs since the financial crisis of 2008, we’ll need numbers significantly above that for several years before we get back to “normal” levels.

Latest Reading: +120,000 nonfarm payrolls increase in March 2012.  The average of the three most recent months is about 212,000.  The graph on the right shows the total number of nonfarm jobs over the past several years.

NOTE: For simplicity, I am only reporting the results of the survey that is sent out to businesses.  In my “Easy Trends” analysis each month, I look at an average of that survey and another survey of households.  Here’s a link to my recent analysis of nonfarm payrolls trends.

Implications: The country was absolutely bleeding jobs in the few months after the financial crisis hit in the fall of 2008.  Things steadily improved until a drop back in early summer 2010.  Ever since then, we still have not seen a negative number of nonfarm payrolls (excluding temporary Census workers hiring/laying off), but we have come close several times.  We probably need about 200,000 jobs a month right now to cover people entering the workforce and to get jobs for those who lost them.  Even though the latest report came in well below that number, the average of the latest three months is still above that threshold.

Easynomics Rating Methodology: For this index, I will base my rating on whether the average of the three most recent readings is enough to keep pace with the growing workforce.  ”Positive” for 3-month average of 100,000 or above, “Negative” for 3-month average below zero, and “Neutral” for anything in between.

continue reading…

Share

Recession Risk – Easy Pod (Apr 5, 2012)

Recession is a scary word for most, and rightfully so.  Let’s talk about it.  I’m continuing a feature called “Easy Pod” – a collection of economic indicators that help portray the current status of something.  In this post, that something is the risk that the U.S. economy will enter a recession in the near future.

(This next section is my usual intro to what a recession is – you can skip straight to below the first line to start reading the actual content.)

Quick ‘n Easy

“Recession” refers to a situation where economic activity is declining.  In a recession, we see a loss of jobs, lower spending by consumers and businesses as well as a decline in pretty much every aspect of the economy.  Stock markets decline and house prices likely drop, too.  It can be a vicious cycle before it reverses itself and lets the economy resume growth once again.  Recessions can be deep and last a long time, or they can be mild and brief.  While some like to define it as a negative GDP growth rate for two quarters in a row, the official determination is made by a group called the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Surely you’ve heard the word recession thrown around in many of the discussions you’ve read about the economy.  Let’s first review quickly what a recession is and why it matters.

From Merriam-Webster Dictionary:

Recession = a period of reduced economic activity

The most commonly accepted way of measuring economic activity is to examine Gross Domestic Product (GDP).  I discussed what the GDP is in this post.  But a very quick review is that the GDP attempts to measure the total value of all economic activity.  Anything someone is willing to pay for would typically go into GDP.  So, it’s no surprise that one of the easiest ways to define a recession would involve a GDP that goes down.

Many people define a recession as “two consecutive quarters of declining GDP.”  That’s six months of an economy that is basically shrinking.  That’s the quick and dirty method.  But the “official” determination of when the U.S. economy is in recession comes from a group called the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).  These folks take a look at all kinds of data, not just GDP.  And they make the determination of when the economy is contracting or expanding.  They often make these determinations many months or perhaps years after the fact.  But it’s considered a more accurate assessment than the simple rule of two quarters of declining GDP.

Why do recessions matter?  Well, you could argue that technically it doesn’t matter whether the economy is growing at 0.001% rate or contracting at a -0.001% rate.  Those two are virtually identical, yet the former could conceivably be the determining factor for being in a recession versus not.  I think the basic idea here is that we want our economy to grow.  It has to grow to support the growing population.  New people need new jobs and new houses.  We can’t have those things if the economy is shrinking.  And while the normal cycles of the economy can lead to brief, temporary periods of contraction (shrinking), we want to avoid prolonged ones.  Thus, the term “recession” refers to a more significant period of contraction.

Determining whether we are in a recession now or that we were in a recession previously is all fine and dandy, but what people like you and me really want to know is whether we are going to be in a recession in the near future.  And for that, there are some helpful tools.  In this “Easy Pod” I will take a look at a few different estimates of the risk of the U.S. economy entering a recession.

For a quick read of this post, just read all the sections highlighted in yellow, plus review the labeled white boxes, and finish off with the “Easy Take” conclusion.


Method #1: Yield Spreads, Credit Spreads and Other Spreads

Quick ‘n Easy

We can compare the risk people are willing to take on certain investments versus the basically risk-free investment of giving loans to the U.S. Government.  The difference in interest earned on these various kinds of investments can often help predict an impending economic slowdown.  Right now, this kind of analysis isn’t showing any signs of danger.  The fact that risky bonds (“junk” bonds) are paying an even higher interest rate than safe ones (higher than usual) is worrisome though.  IMPORTANT: Interest rates have been set so low (basically zero) by the Federal Reserve, that many believe looking at spreads like these is misleading when measuring risk of recession because such an analysis would be overly optimistic.

Basic Concept: U.S. Treasuries (loans people make to the U.S. Government so it can fund its operations) are considered the safest investment, essentially risk free.  That means you usually get some of the lowest interest paid to you (yield) on these investments – remember, less risk equals less reward.  If you compare the interest rate on other kinds of loans, like corporate bonds (loans that people make to companies so they can fund their operations), to the interest rate of Treasuries, you can get a sense for how risky the other investment really is.  That difference in interest rates is called a “spread.”  Similarly, if you look at the yield on a longer-term Treasury versus a shorter-term one, you can see how much riskier the longer-term loan really is.

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

One of the reasonably good predictors for recessions has been the difference between the yield on 10-year Treasury notes and 3-month Treasury bills.  Generally speaking, when you lend someone money for a longer period of time, you expect to be paid interest at a higher rate, because there are greater risks that the money will not be returned to you, and you likely had other great things you could have done with that money.  Thus, it makes sense that the yield on 10-year Treasuries should be higher than 3-month Treasuries.  But how much more is a pretty good indicator for what is coming up in the economy.

When times are starting to get tough, people start worrying even about short-term loans to the government, and so the difference between these two yields gets less and less.  If it flip-flops and the yield is higher on 3-month than on 10-year, it’s a really good bet that a recession is around the corner (probably 9 months or so later).

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York translates the “spread” (difference) between the 10-year and 3-month Treasury into a probability of recession in the upcoming 12 months.

According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the probability that the U.S. economy will be in recession in February 2013 is only 4.24% – up from a 3.80% chance of recession in December 2012.

continue reading…

Share

Leading Indicators – Easy Pod (Mar 28, 2012)

Leading indicators are in the business of predicting the future, so they’re definitely worth discussing.  I’m continuing a feature I’m calling “Easy Pod” – a collection of indicators that help portray the current status of something.  In this post, that something is leading indicators, which are indicators that help us determine where the economy will be a few months from now.  Let’s first review quickly what leading indicators are and why they matter. (If you’ve read this Easy Pod before, skip down to below the first horizontal line.)

Quick ‘n Easy

Leading indicators are indicators that tend to predict what will happen several months down the road.  The “leading” refers to the fact that the indicators will often change in a particular direction before the actual economic situation catches up.

From Wikipedia (I know, I know, but they had the best definition!):

Leading indicators are indicators that usually change before the economy as a whole changes.  They are therefore useful as short-term predictors of the economy.

Sure it’s great to know what the GDP for last quarter was or how much consumers spent last month.  But those all give us a sense for what’s happening right now.  When I want to make decisions (like how to invest my money, whether to put off a purchase, etc.) I need to know about the future.  That’s why we are interested in leading indicators, a set of magic numbers that tell us exactly where the economy will be in about 6 months, with 100% certainty.  OK, so that’s not entirely true.  Actually, it’s totally a lie.  But the point is that these indicators are much more correlated (that’s a fancy term for things that happen together) with the future state of the economy than other indicators are.

There are a number of indicators that do this, and there are even some people who combine these indicators into one number (an index) to give a summary.  In this “Easy Pod” I will take a look at a few of those indices that I like to follow.  Check back regularly for updates.

 


Quick Summary

Indicator (Click for details – only works if full article is open) Current Rating (change)
Leading Economic Index Positive
Daily Consumer Leading Indicators Negative
ECRI Weekly Leading Index Negative
USA Today / IHS Global Insight Economic Outlook Index Neutral
OECD Composite Leading Indicators Neutral




Indicator: Leading Economic Index   |   POSITIVE
Easy Intro: None yet  |  Leading Economic Index – The Conference Board – Click here  |  Latest Date This Info Represents: February 2012

Quick ‘n Easy

An index that combines the results of ten leading indicators into one number suggests that the pace of economic growth through summer 2012, and maybe beyond, will be healthy.  Most components of the index look good, except perhaps for industrial production.

Leading Indicators - Leading Economic Index US - The Conference Board - Feb 2012

Source: Conference-Board.org

Easy Description: Basically, this index from The Conference Board is a combination of several indicators that traditionally correlate well to the future state of the economy, generally 6-9 months ahead.  For simplicity, we won’t talk about all the indicators that it combines.  You can read about it yourself by clicking on the source link above.

From The Conference Board’s website:

The composite economic indexes are the key elements in an analytic system designed to signal peaks and troughs in the business cycle.

We’re singling out the “leading” part of their index.  They have other indices that tell us how things are now (coincident) and how they have been (lagging).

When this index declines in value by about 1-2% over several months, and during that time most of the individual components of the index are declining, that is a pretty good sign that a recession is coming soon.

Latest Reading: The latest reading of the Leading Economic Index is 95.5, which is 0.7% higher than the previous month.  The index is now 1.9 percent higher over the last six months, and during that time seven of the ten components have been positive contributors.  This month, eight out of the ten components that make up this index made positive contributions.  One of the biggest sources of positive contribution in any single component came from the difference between 10-year Treasury yield and the federal funds rate (“interest rate spread”) – but this is artificially affected by the Federal Reserve’s lowering of interest rates, and so it may be overly optimistic.  Tied for first with that interest rate spread was the weekly initial unemployment claims figures, which have been great of late.  The worst component was the consumer expectations piece, which is fortunate because consumers’ actual behaviors don’t tend to track their expectations as much as their income.

Implications: There really weren’t any components that got significantly worse from the previous month.  Components that improved a significant amount in February versus January were: weekly unemployment claims, two separate manufacturing related categories, and building permits.  But once again, the single largest contributor (tied for 1st) is the “Interest Rate Spread.”  Unfortunately, this has to do with the Federal Reserve’s interventions (reducing interest rates).  Normally, better interest rate spreads are true leading indicators, but not so much when their presence is largely “artificial” to some degree.  Since July 2010, this portion of the index has been positive every month except for April 2011. One of The Conference Board’s economists stated, “Recent data reflect an economy that improved this winter. To be sure, an unseasonably mild winter has contributed to many of the recent positive economic reports. But the consistent signal for the leading series suggests that progress on jobs, output, and incomes may continue through the summer months, if not beyond.”

Easynomics Rating Methodology: For this index, I will base my rating largely on the comments from The Conference Board experts. continue reading…

Share

Jobs, Employment, Labor and Livelihood Overview (JELLO) – Easy Pod

I’m continuing a feature called “Easy Pod” – a collection of indicators that help portray the current status of something.  In this post, that something is the employment situation of the country.

Quick ‘n Easy

Why do we care about jobs?  Without jobs, consumers can’t be consumers because they wouldn’t have any money to spend.  In a healthy economy, we see strong growth in jobs and a low unemployment rate.

Why do we care so much about jobs, employment, labor and livelihood so much? (OK – so that last term is something I threw in there to make “JELLO” work – investors don’t use that one!)  Simply put, jobs are the lifeline of the economy.  When the economy is working at its best, we have great ideas that turn into great products.  And those great products have to be manufactured, marketed and sold to the consumer.  In order to make all of that happen, there have to people working to make it happen.  That means jobs.  And the income they take home will enable them to buy a house, a car, groceries, clothes, toys, appliances, vacations and tickets to the movies.  All of the money they spent is now income for another set of people, who then go and do the same thing.  Without a job, consumers don’t have (or don’t act like they have) the money to buy anything, so the whole thing slows down.  That’s good enough for an “Easy” look at why jobs matter.

There are a number of indicators that shed light on what’s happening in employment, and there are even some people who combine these indicators into one number (an index) to give a summary.  In this “Easy Pod” I will take a look at a few indicators and indices that I like to follow.  Check back regularly for updates.


Quick Summary

Indicator (Click for details – only works if full article is open) Current Rating (Change)
Monthly Change in Nonfarm Payrolls Positive
Employment Trends Index Positive   (upgrade)
ISM Report on Business Positive   (upgrade)
Gallup Daily Poll: U.S. Employment Negative
Easynomics Temporary Staffing Index  (NEW INDEX) Neutral
Intuit Small Business Employment Index Positive




Indicator: Nonfarm Payrolls – Monthly Change   |   POSITIVE
Easy Intro: None yet   |   Link to Nonfarm Payrolls data   |   Latest Date This Info Represents: February 2012

Quick ‘n Easy

The monthly change in jobs (excluding farming jobs, because they have lots of ups and downs that mask the underlying trend) is one of the most widely accepted barometers of the labor market.  The average monthly change over the past three months has been greater than the typical number of people entering the workforce, which is great news.

Easy Description: Every month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) issues the “Employment Situation Summary” and discusses the changes in the labor market.  The headline number everyone looks for is the change in nonfarm payrolls.  The reason we are looking for the change in number of “nonfarm” jobs is that farming is a very seasonal business, so its patterns mask the general underlying trends in the regular labor market.

Generally speaking, we need about 100,000 new jobs per month to keep up with the number of people who are entering the labor force nationwide.  Because we’ve lost millions of jobs since the financial crisis of 2008, we’ll need numbers significantly above that for several years before we get back to “normal” levels.

Latest Reading: +227,000 nonfarm payrolls increase in February 2012.  The average of the three most recent months is 245,000.  The graph on the right shows the total number of nonfarm jobs over the past several years.

NOTE: For simplicity, I am only reporting the results of the survey that is sent out to businesses.  In my “Easy Trends” analysis each month, I look at an average of that survey and another survey of households.

Implications: The country was absolutely bleeding jobs in the few months after the financial crisis hit in the fall of 2008.  Things steadily improved until a drop back in early summer 2010.  Ever since then, we still have not seen a negative number of nonfarm payrolls (excluding temporary Census workers hiring/laying off), but we have come close several times.  We probably need about 200,000 jobs a month right now to cover people entering the workforce and to get jobs for those who lost them.  Fortunately, we’ve hit that level in four of the last six months.

Easynomics Rating Methodology: For this index, I will base my rating on whether the average of the three most recent readings is enough to keep pace with the growing workforce.  ”Positive” for 3-month average of 100,000 or above, “Negative” for 3-month average below zero, and “Neutral” for anything in between.

continue reading…

Share