Browsing Posts in Easynomics Court

Easynomics Court

For an explanation on “Easynomics Court” and how it works, read this page on leading indicators vs six months into the future.

Leading Indicators vs February 2012

Original charge made in August 2011: “The Leading Indicators hereby charge that February 2012 shall be a NEUTRAL month, as indicated by a positive growth rate but below historical averages.”

NOTE: I don’t have all the historical data perfectly the way I’d like to see it from August 2011 (the date the “charges” would have been made) so I am only reasonably certain that the leading indicators would have charged it this way.

Exhibit A – ECRI U.S. Coincident Index Growth Rate | NEUTRAL

The U.S. Coincident Index for February 2012 grew at an annualized rate of 3.41 percent from the index six months prior.  This is positive and barely above a historically average level of 3.3 percent.  This is consistent with an economy that is not in recession but not growing at an unusually fast pace either.

Easy Description: The Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) does something very similar to the Coincident Economic Index from The Conference Board, but they are not at all transparent about how they do their calculations.  We can only wait to see what they publish as their index level and see where it leaves us.

Easynomics Rating Methodology: I like to examine the indicator’s growth rate over the past six months but expressed as an annualized rate.  When that is between 3.0 and 3.6 percent, I will issue a “neutral” rating – above or below that range will be “positive” or “negative” respectively.

continue reading…

Share

Leading Indicators vs September 2012 – Easynomics Court

For an explanation on “Easynomics Court” and how it works, read this page on leading indicators vs six months into the future.

 


Leading Indicators from March 2012

Charges Filed: “The Leading Indicators hereby charge that September 2012 shall be a POSITIVE month, as indicated by a positive growth rate above the historical average of 3.3 percent.”

Exhibit A – e-Forecasting Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) | POSITIVE

Leading Indicators - e-Forecasting Leading Economic Index eLEI - April 2012

Source: e-Forecasting.com

In the six months leading up to March 2012, the e-Forecasting eLEI rose at an annualized rate of about 14.3 percent.  This is consistent with a stronger than average economy over the next six months.

Easy Description: e-Forecasting.com has many useful tools for tracking the economy.  Their Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) is a proprietary model to predict the direction of the economy several months in advance.  The concept is similar to The Conference Board’s LEI does.  Many people believe this is a good leading indicator for the economy, and there is some very good work that validates that.

Easynomics Rating Methodology: I will calculate the change in the eLEI over the six months leading up to the month the “charges” are being filed.  I will convert that change into an annualized rate.  If the annualized rate is less than zero, I will issue a “negative” rating – 3.3 percent or higher will be “positive” – anything in between will be “neutral.”

continue reading…

Share

Leading Indicators vs August 2012 – Easynomics Court

For an explanation on “Easynomics Court” and how it works, read this page on leading indicators vs six months into the future.

 


Leading Indicators from February 2012

Charges Filed: “The Leading Indicators hereby charge that August 2012 shall be a POSITIVE month, as indicated by a positive growth rate above the historical average of 3.3 percent.”

Exhibit A – e-Forecasting Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) | POSITIVE

Leading Indicators - e-Forecasting Leading Economic Index eLEI - March 2012

Source: e-Forecasting.com

In the six months leading up to February 2012, the e-Forecasting eLEI rose at an annualized rate of about 16.1 percent.  This is consistent with a stronger than average economy over the next six months.

Easy Description: e-Forecasting.com has many useful tools for tracking the economy.  Their Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) is a proprietary model to predict the direction of the economy several months in advance.  The concept is similar to The Conference Board’s LEI does.  Many people believe this is a good leading indicator for the economy, and there is some very good work that validates that.

Easynomics Rating Methodology: I will calculate the change in the eLEI over the six months leading up to the month the “charges” are being filed.  I will convert that change into an annualized rate.  If the annualized rate is less than zero, I will issue a “negative” rating – 3.3 percent or higher will be “positive” – anything in between will be “neutral.”

continue reading…

Share

Leading Indicators vs July 2012 – Easynomics Court

For an explanation on “Easynomics Court” and how it works, read this page on leading indicators vs six months into the future.

 


Leading Indicators from January 2012

Charges Filed: “The Leading Indicators hereby charge that July 2012 shall be a NEUTRAL month, as indicated by a positive growth rate but below the historical average of 3.3 percent.”

Exhibit A – e-Forecasting Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) | POSITIVE

Leading Indicators - e-Forecasting Leading Economic Index eLEI - March 2012

Source: e-Forecasting.com

In the six months leading up to January 2012, the e-Forecasting eLEI rose at an annualized rate of about 6.9 percent.  This is consistent with a stronger than average economy over the next six months.

Easy Description: e-Forecasting.com has many useful tools for tracking the economy.  Their Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) is a proprietary model to predict the direction of the economy several months in advance.  The concept is similar to The Conference Board’s LEI does.  Many people believe this is a good leading indicator for the economy, and there is some very good work that validates that.

Easynomics Rating Methodology: I will calculate the change in the eLEI over the six months leading up to the month the “charges” are being filed.  I will convert that change into an annualized rate.  If the annualized rate is less than zero, I will issue a “negative” rating – 3.3 percent or higher will be “positive” – anything in between will be “neutral.”

continue reading…

Share

Leading Indicators vs June 2012 – Easynomics Court

NOTE: This is a corrected post.  Previously, the LEI from The Conference Board was incorrectly rated as “positive” because I didn’t have access to six-month historical data and had to use three-month data.  Moreover, the index has been significantly changed recently, so I am using the newer version here.  I have since located the correct data, which downgraded that indicator to “neutral” – thus changing the expected economic performance for six months later.

For an explanation on “Easynomics Court” and how it works, read this page on leading indicators vs six months into the future.

 


Leading Indicators from December 2011

Charges Filed: “The Leading Indicators hereby charge that June 2012 shall be a NEUTRAL month, as indicated by a positive growth rate but below the historical average of 3.3 percent.”

Exhibit A – e-Forecasting Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) | POSITIVE

Leading Indicators - e-Forecasting Leading Economic Index eLEI - March 2012

Source: e-Forecasting.com

In the six months leading up to December 2011, the e-Forecasting eLEI rose at an annualized rate of about 4.0 percent.  This is consistent with a stronger than average economy over the next six months.

Easy Description: e-Forecasting.com has many useful tools for tracking the economy.  Their Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) is a proprietary model to predict the direction of the economy several months in advance.  The concept is similar to The Conference Board’s LEI does.  Many people believe this is a good leading indicator for the economy, and there is some very good work that validates that.

Easynomics Rating Methodology: I will calculate the change in the eLEI over the six months leading up to the month the “charges” are being filed.  I will convert that change into an annualized rate.  If the annualized rate is less than zero, I will issue a “negative” rating – 3.3 percent or higher will be “positive” – anything in between will be “neutral.”

continue reading…

Share

Easynomics Court

For an explanation on “Easynomics Court” and how it works, read this page on leading indicators vs six months into the future.

Leading Indicators vs January 2012

Original charge made in July 2011: “The Leading Indicators hereby charge that January 2012 shall be a NEUTRAL month, as indicated by a positive growth rate but below historical averages.”

NOTE: I don’t have all the historical data perfectly the way I’d like to see it from July 2011 (the date the “charges” would have been made) so I am only reasonably certain that the leading indicators would have charged it this way.

Exhibit A – ECRI U.S. Coincident Index Growth Rate | NEUTRAL

The U.S. Coincident Index for January 2012 grew at an annualized rate of 3.29 percent from the index six months prior (virtually the same as the rate for the last month).  This is positive but virtually right at a historically normal level.  This is consistent with an economy that is not in recession but not growing at an unusually fast pace either.

Easy Description: The Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) does something very similar to the Coincident Economic Index from The Conference Board, but they are not at all transparent about how they do their calculations.  We can only wait to see what they publish as their index level and see where it leaves us.

I like to examine the indicator’s growth rate over the past six months but expressed an annualized rate.  When that is well below zero, we are probably in a recession.  If it is well above, we are in a healthy expansion.  Anything in between is likely a weak economy that is not in recession.

continue reading…

Share