Leading Indicators vs September 2013 – Easynomics Court
For an explanation on “Easynomics Court” and how it works, read this page on leading indicators vs six months into the future.
NOTE: In case you are accessing this post long after it was originally posted, you may also be interested in the most recent Easynomics Court case.
As of today, the official Easynomics Court conviction record for categorizing the growth level six months into the future is:
- 5 – Guilty (Win)
- 6 – Not Guilty (Loss)
- Conviction Rate = 45 percent
Leading Indicators from March 2013
Charges Filed: “The Leading Indicators hereby charge that September 2013 shall be a NEUTRAL month, as indicated by a positive annualized growth rate but below the historical average of 3.3 percent.”
Exhibit A – e-Forecasting Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) | NEUTRAL
In the six months leading up to March 2013, the e-Forecasting eLEI rose at an annualized rate of about 1.3 percent. This is consistent with an economy that is growing but at a slower-than-average rate, historically speaking.
Easy Description: e-Forecasting.com has many useful tools for tracking the economy. Their Leading Economic Indicator (eLEI) is a proprietary model to predict the direction of the economy several months in advance. The concept is similar to The Conference Board’s LEI does. Many people believe this is a good leading indicator for the economy, and there is some very good work that validates that.
Easynomics Rating Methodology: I will calculate the change in the eLEI over the six months leading up to the month the “charges” are being filed. I will convert that change into an annualized rate. If the annualized rate is less than zero, I will issue a “negative” rating – 3.3 percent or higher will be “positive” – anything in between will be “neutral.” NOTE: I will use the first available data for the month where possible – i.e., I won’t use revised data – this way, I’m simulating what the leading indicators really believe at the time they are released.



